Agentic AI Foundation
HomeEventsResourcesNewslettersSlack
Sign in
Copyright © The Linux Foundation®. All rights reserved. The Linux Foundation has registered trademarks and uses trademarks. For more information, including terms of use, privacy policy, and trademark usage, please see our Policies page.
← Conference Recap
MCP Dev Summit
Seoul 2026
MLOps Community
AI Agents SummitCoding Agents ConferenceAgents in Production 2025
AGNTCon + MCPCon
Europe 2026
On this page
ThemesKeynotes and framingAgent architecture and orchestrationSecurity, identity, and gatewaysContext engineering and token efficiencyTool design principlesObservability and reliabilityWorkshops and hands-on labs
Resources/Conference Recap/MCP Dev Summit

Seoul 2026

46 talks, 7 themes, one fast way through the event — key takeaways, standout quotes, and every recording from MCP Dev Summit Seoul 2026.

On this page
ThemesKeynotes and framingAgent architecture and orchestrationSecurity, identity, and gatewaysContext engineering and token efficiencyTool design principlesObservability and reliabilityWorkshops and hands-on labs

Themes

Keynotes and framing Opening and closing keynotes framing MCP's ecosystem, interoperability, and enterprise direction. 7 talks ↓ Agent architecture and orchestration How teams design agent systems, decide when to use MCP, and operate them across domains. 8 talks ↓ Security, identity, and gateways Authorization, gateways, and hardening patterns for securing MCP servers and agent traffic in production. 8 talks ↓ Context engineering and token efficiency Techniques for managing context budgets, tool curation, and docs to keep agents efficient and accurate. 7 talks ↓ Tool design principles Practical guidance and pitfalls for designing, testing, and building MCP servers and tools well. 6 talks ↓ Observability and reliability Approaches to monitoring, debugging, and recovering from failures in MCP-based agent systems. 4 talks ↓ Workshops and hands-on labs Interactive sessions for building and running MCP servers across mobile, Java, and multi-agent setups. 6 talks ↓

Keynotes and framing

1
Demetrios Brinkmann
AAIF (Agentic AI Foundation)

Keynote: Welcome & Opening Remarks

Worth noting

Opening remarks for MCP Dev Summit Seoul: AAIF added Visa, Wells Fargo and Alibaba as gold members, and the community held seven global meetups celebrating the new MCP 2.0 stateless spec release.

Quote

We had lead maintainers giving talks. People are still talking about this today, the new release, right?

2
Den Delimarsky
Anthropic (Member of Technical Staff)

Keynote: Two Years of MCP: State of The Ecosystem

Worth noting

MCP SDK downloads hit 3.06B cumulative (28x last July), the registry has 20k+ servers, and SDKs grew from 2 to 10 languages, backed by Google, Microsoft, JetBrains.

Quote

We're at half a billion downloads a month... 3.06 billion downloads total for those three SDKs only.

3
Woo Hyung Choi
Principal Solutions Architect, Amazon Web Services

Keynote: Beyond Protocol Compatibility: Building an Interoperable Agent Ecosystem

Worth noting

MCP's July 28 spec update shifts it from stateful to stateless for enterprise-scale load balancing; a new "Agent Plugins 1.0" open standard lets coding-assistant plugins move across tools like Cursor, Copilot, and Codex.

Quote

Protocol compatibility is just the foundation at the bottom, not the ceiling at the top.

4
Demetrios Brinkmann
Member Non-Technical Staff, Agentic AI Foundation

Keynote: Welcome Back

Worth noting

Announced the Agentic AI Foundation's upcoming MCP certificate launching next month, plus a wave of new regional MCP Dev Summit events and expanding podcast/YouTube content.

Quote

I'm going to just list off a ton of QR codes right now.

5
HyunSoo Kim
Solutions Architect, Workato

Keynote: From AI Investment to Business Impact: An Enterprise MCP Playbook for the Agentic Era

Worth noting

Workato advocates wrapping multi-step business logic (e.g., refunds) into single locked-down workflow MCP tools rather than exposing thin per-action MCP servers directly to the LLM, plus a central MCP registry/proxy for auth, logging and auditing across 14,000+ connectors.

Quote

AI가 결국 제대로 일하려면 시스템과 데이터가 연결돼야 된다는 문제점들 그걸 해결해야 되는 상황이 벌어지는 거죠.

6
Speaker

Keynote: A Cloud Service Provider's MCP Operations Story (From MCP Generator to MCP Gateway)

Worth noting

Quote

잘 만드는 것도 중요하지만 잘 전달하는 것도 중요하다는 것을요

7
Ana Jiménez Santamaria
AAIF Ambassador & Senior Project Manager, The Linux Foundation

Keynote: MCP and the New Frontier for OSPOs

Worth noting

Preliminary Linux Foundation OSPO survey data shows 35% of organizations with OSPOs already co-lead AI governance initiatives, and 44% participate in related discussions.

Quote

Perhaps now the next frontier to scale this adoption and have more organizations across different industries implementing this is operational trust.

Agent architecture and orchestration

1
Junho Kong
SK On

When Does an Agentic Workflow Need MCP? Matching Intelligence and Interfaces to the Outcome

Worth noting

Proposes a decision checklist: use coding agents for uncertain exploration, versioned templates for stable methods, APIs for known contracts, workflow engines for state, and MCP only when multiple hosts need standardized discovery.

Quote

MCP is not the automatic next step after one useful result. It is an interface choice.

2
Seoyul Yoon
AAIF Community Seoul

From Legacy To Agentic AI

Worth noting

Combined 5 open-source projects (FastMCP, a custom Swagger→OpenAPI converter, a Kubernetes Operator, LangGraph/deepagents, langchain-mcp-adapter) to auto-generate MCP tools from OpenAPI specs, avoiding hand-coded tool functions per backend.

Quote

I will talk about how to transform from legacy to agentic AI.

3
Navtej Reddy
Observe.ai

Why We Made Our AI Agent Platform a Codebase Before Adding MCP

Worth noting

Observe.ai rebuilt its voice-AI agent platform as Git repos (branches, PRs, diffs, blame) so MCP-driven edits get CI simulations/evals and reviewable rollback instead of direct production changes.

Quote

Can we like build agents as code bases, right? And basically what we get like all of the benefits that software development has like figured out and like solved for over the years.

4
HyounKyoung Moon
Lablup

Operating an AI Infrastructure Through MCP Apps on Agents

Worth noting

Lablup demoed MCP Apps rendering live GPU cluster dashboards inline in a chat agent, letting operators query, inspect and delete idle sessions with clicks instead of navigating Backend.AI's dashboards.

Quote

MCP 앱스는 어떻게 보면은 LM이 말로만 설명할 수 있는 것에 화이트보드 같은 걸 지워 준다라고 생각하시면 됩니다.

5
Nasiullha Chaudhari
YugabyteDB

Stateful AI Agents: Building Consistent Systems with MCP and Distributed SQL

Worth noting

Argues MCP doesn't cover idempotency or durable state; recommends idempotency keys tied to task IDs, optimistic version checks, and write-ahead "pending" status rows to prevent duplicate charges on retry.

Quote

A timeout does not always mean it's a failure. It's not about intelligence, it's about reliability.

6
Sasha Denisov
Brainform.ai

MCP on Mobile: How Far Have We Come?

Worth noting

Live demo showed a phone hosting its own MCP server (Flutter/Gemma) reachable via cable/iproxy from Claude Code, exposing calendar and device-info tools, but iOS restricts it to foreground-only.

Quote

So our mobile phone now playing a role of MCP server and you actually can provide any capability of mobile phone.

7
Anshuman Singh
Devfolio

Commanding SO101 With Agents

Worth noting

Instead of training a vision-language-action model (200+ failed demonstrations), the speaker built an 8-tool MCP server letting Claude Code directly command a $200 SO-101 robot arm via teleoperation-recorded coordinates.

Quote

What if we use MCP, that is you give an instruction to the robotic arm, there is an agent in between, and it calls a couple of tools via the MCP server, and it does the final action.

8
Hoon Jo, Daniel Oh, Ana Jiménez Santamaría, Kevin Dubois & Junghwan Park
Megazone · Red Hat · Linux Foundation · IBM · PyTorch Korea

AAIF Ambassador AMA: Building the Agentic Future Through Community Contribution

Worth noting

Panel of newly appointed Agentic AI Foundation ambassadors introduced AAIF's four founding projects (MCP, Goose, AGENTS.md, agentgateway) and fielded audience Q&A on adoption challenges like security and human-in-the-loop control.

Quote

An LLM can provide probabilistic information, but it cannot do deterministic tasks, and MCP enables you to do that.

Security, identity, and gateways

1
Aram Andreasyan
Cerbos

Authorization in MCP Systems: Getting It Right From the Start

Worth noting

Argues MCP needs two authorization checks—tools/list (discovery) and tools/call (parameter-level)—and that most teams only enforce the second, and poorly.

Quote

Denial is a signal. It's not a wall. When an agent actually sees denial, it's going to try something else.

2
Jorge Ruiz Arto
Gravitee

Who Authorized That Agent? Identity and Policy Enforcement for MCP Tool Calls

Worth noting

Survey data cited: 80% of orgs ship agents unsecured, 90% run unmonitored agents, and Gartner projects 150,000 agents per Fortune 500 company by 2029.

Quote

You cannot review or permission a decision that doesn't exist until the moment it is actually made.

3
Dakshitha Ratnayake
WSO2

Three Gateways for the Agentic Era: An Architectural Framework for Governing AI Agent Traffic

Worth noting

Proposes unifying API, LLM, and MCP gateways under shared OAuth2 identity, one observability pipeline, and one policy plane to avoid fragmented, ad-hoc agent traffic governance.

Quote

So your gateway thinks it's an attack but it's actually a paying customer and that's a shift.

4
Valeri Milke
VamiSec GmbH

Secure MCP Servers in Production: A Practical Guide for Developers

Worth noting

Advocates combining STRIDE, MAESTRO and the OWASP MCP Top 10 for threat modeling, plus OAuth 2.1/PKCE, MCP gateways, SBOMs, and continuous re-validation to catch "rug pull" attacks on previously trusted servers.

Quote

MCP can be compared with USB-C, a standard for connecting agents, LLMs with services, but there is no security in it.

5
Phuong Bac Ta & Vitumbiko Mafeni
Research Center for Distributed Cloud and Networking, SSU, South Korea · CNLAB | SSU IISTRC

Who Watches the Watchmen? Safe AI-Agent Failover Via MCP and CRDs

Worth noting

Their failover MCP server exposes only 4 scoped tools (3 observation, 1 "propose failover") that write to a CRD; a human must approve the state change before a Kubernetes operator executes the actual cluster migration.

Quote

Let AI decide what to recommend and let MCP define what the AI agent may request and also let Kubernetes decide what can actually execute.

6
Arshardh Ifthikar
WSO2

Hardening MCP Integrations Against Tool Poisoning

Worth noting

Cites research that 72.8% of agent systems and 5.5% of 1,899 public MCP servers are susceptible to tool poisoning; recommends treating tool definitions, schemas and outputs as untrusted, verified via an MCP gateway with hashed/pinned tool lists.

Quote

Every tool definition should be treated as untrusted input.

7
Brandon Kang
Akamai Technologies

Beyond APIs: Making MCP Services Faster and Secure With WebAssembly

Worth noting

Proposes running MCP tools as sandboxed WASM/WASI modules with deny-by-default host access (file/network/env/secrets); live demo showed ~10ms average tool response times while blocking unauthorized filesystem, network-port, and secret-access attempts.

Quote

웹 어셈블리 프로세스 자체는 이 가상의 어떤 샌드박스 모듈에서 구동되기 때문에 이 호스트에 대한 권한이라는 게 아예 없습니다.

8
Faizan Akhtar
React India

From APIs To Agentic Toolkits: Designing MCP Flavors and a Public MCP Gateway at Scale

Worth noting

Proposes "flavors" (curated, goal-based tool bundles at /{flavorId}/mcp) served via a proxy gateway with layered "Swiss cheese" security across public MCP, API gateway, and internal MCP layers.

Quote

A good MCP platform doesn't just make more tools available. It makes the right tools discoverable, routable, secure and measurable.

Context engineering and token efficiency

1
Nimit Savant & Gokul K S
DevRev

The Context Budget Crisis: Why MCP Needs Server-Side Response Controls

Worth noting

Production telemetry showed tool schemas eating 37% of a 200k context window; their progressive schema disclosure approach cut effective schema size by 70%.

Quote

Spend context on reasoning, not actually plumbing data, filtering, and all of those things can really be taken care by your server tool calls.

2
Aanchal Mishra & Ali Mustafa Shaikh
Postman · Pieces AI

Closing the Context Gap: Making Your APIs Agent-Ready

Worth noting

Live A/B test on identical tasks showed a well-structured OpenAPI schema cut API calls from 17 to 6, tokens from ~55K to ~28K, and time from 50s to 18s versus a vague schema.

Quote

Agent readiness is the amount of guessing work that we need to get there to actually get the result done right.

3
Tanisha Sharma & Jyoti Bisht
Bolna · Independent

Two Audiences, One Markdown File: Writing MCP Docs an Agent Can Actually Use

Worth noting

Rewriting an MCP server's docs with five rules—single source of truth, flattened narrative, explicit constraints, one canonical example, resolved referents—cut agent hallucinations and improved human docs too.

Quote

It will be either completely correct answer or incorrect answer, there would be nothing in between.

4
Nimit Savant & Gokul K S
DevRev

From 40 Tools To 14: A Practical Framework for MCP Tool Curation

Worth noting

DevRev cut their MCP server from 40+ tools to 14 by consolidating per-object CRUD calls into generic get/update/link tools and bundling linked context (comments, tickets) into single responses.

Quote

You don't want your agent to know that there are 100 MCP tool calls which are available. Your agent should know that these are the 14 calls.

5
Bhumika Satpathy
Google

Managing Token Usage in MCP Servers Using Code Mode

Worth noting

Quote

6
Seokho Son
ETRI

Building and Taming an MCP Server for Multi-Cloud Vibe Computing

Worth noting

Naive REST-to-MCP generation for the Cloud-Barista multi-cloud project caused runaway provisioning (VMs up to $366/hr) and token overflows; fixes included cost caps, admin approval gates, response summarization, fewer/merged tools, multi-model testing, and bolting on the Agentgateway project for trust/security.

Quote

I'm one of the maintainers for open source project called Cloud Barista

7
Dale Seo
Apollo GraphQL

Skills and MCP: Complementary, Not Competing

Worth noting

Apollo's experience shows MCP provides live access/capabilities while Skills encode conventions and know-how; teams should ship both as maintained software, not treat one as replacing the other.

Quote

MCP gives the agent reach. Skills give it direction. They work better together.

Tool design principles

1
Daniel Oh
Red Hat/IBM

The 5 Wrong Reasons to Build an MCP Server (And What to Do Instead)

Worth noting

Oh shows MCP tool calls can use ~10x more tokens than direct function calling, and offers a 5-point checklist (need 3+ yes) to decide if MCP is warranted.

Quote

MCP designed for connect to one of a tool. If you add more like a many tools one MCP server and your MCP will end up like a monolithic MCP server

2
Tanisha Sharma & Animesh Pathak
Bolna · Harness

Your MCP Server Behaves Differently in Every Client: A Cross-Client Field Guide for Server Authors

Worth noting

Cursor silently truncates tool descriptions at a 6,500-character limit with no error; pagination bugs also drop tools (e.g., 48 tools showing only 30 in Claude, 14 showing only 8 in Cursor).

Quote

One of them was failing silently and I didn't know what went wrong because the MCP server was same... The only difference was they were only three different clients.

3
K. Cabigon
TwelveLabs

From API To Agent: Building a Video Intelligence MCP Server and Plugin Ecosystem

Worth noting

TwelveLabs' Jockey MCP server ships 9+ tools that bound long-running video ingestion, offload uploads outside the 500MB chat limit, and render video answers via a custom view-tree grammar instead of round-tripping through the LLM.

Quote

We wanted to ship the capability, not the destination.

4
Seowoo Han
B GARAGE

When AI Agents Need Eyes: What MCP Can and Cannot Standardize for Computer Vision

Worth noting

Surveying six vision MCP servers (Roboflow, Voxel51, Twelve Labs, NVIDIA), the speaker found agents excel at labeling review but only scored 40/75 on a drone-inspection failure-analysis golden set, arguing human-in-the-loop remains essential.

Quote

GPT 5.6이 나오고 나서는 75개의 골든셋 중에 40개 정도만 맞았고요.

5
Kevin Dubois & Daniel Oh
IBM · Red Hat

Why Enterprise MCP Runs on Java

Worth noting

Quarkus + LangChain4j lets you build MCP servers/clients with a few dependencies and annotations (@Tool, @McpToolBox), plus built-in dev-UI testing and observability, while citing studies showing Java is far more energy-efficient than Python at scale.

Quote

So why not use Java for your AI and particularly for MCP?

6
Navin Pai
StackGen

Building and Testing MCP Servers With the Inspector, Conformance Suites, and Property-Based Testing

Worth noting

Proposes a testing pyramid (unit tests, Inspector, conformance suites, fuzzing with Hypothesis/fast-check, linting, LLM evals) and cites Jenkins' MCP server returning 400k-character tool outputs as a real-world design failure.

Quote

Building an MCP server today is very, very, very easy... eight lines of code for you to have an MCP that has one tool.

Observability and reliability

1
Sho Tanaka
Snowflake

When MCP Tools Fail: Reliable ML Inference for MCP Agents

Worth noting

Proposes a four-pillar trust framework (request, execution, result, identity) plus a JSON "trust envelope" with trace IDs and model versioning to make ML-backed MCP tools auditable; includes an open-source demo repo with injected failure modes.

Quote

LM as a orchestrator, ML as a specialist.

2
Sunyoung Park
KC-ML2

Stop Wrapping APIs: Building Structured Execution Boundaries With MCP for Incident Triage

Worth noting

KC-ML2 moved from thin API-wrapper MCP tools to a boundary returning checked outcomes (healthy/critical/indeterminate) with reasons and bounded actions, preventing an LLM from recommending failover to an offline server.

Quote

Instead of asking only what tools should I expose, I recommend ask what decision should this boundary make.

3
Speaker

Evolving an LLMOps Feedback System Into an MCP-Based Agent Architecture

Worth noting

Quote

이런 부분이 확실히 MCP 프로토콜에서 점점 발전하면서 좀 더 고려가 잘 되더라고요.

4
Pritesh Kiri
Harness

From CRDs to Conversations: Simplifying Chaos Engineering With MCP

Worth noting

Litmus Chaos's MCP server lets non-experts query experiments, probes, and infrastructure context in natural language, though experiment creation via MCP is not yet supported.

Quote

We're trying to, you know, decrease the degree of hierarchy which can operate chaos engineering.

Workshops and hands-on labs

1
Goobong Jeong
Team Attention

Workshop: How to Use Sol-Terra-Luna in One Goal

Worth noting

Describes GoalHouse, an open-sourced framework letting Codex's frontier "Sol" model track past delegation success/failure to cheaper "Terra"/"Luna" sub-models across goal runs, informed by Luna's 80% API price cut.

Quote

모델이 너무 똑똑해졌기 때문에 하네스로 코딩을 더 잘하게 해 줄 만한 게 없어요. 그냥 골 돌리면 됩니다.

2
Goobong Jeong
Team Attention

Workshop: How to Use Sol-Terra-Luna in One Goal

Worth noting

OpenAI cut Luna's API price 80%, and Luna at max reasoning rivals Sol's medium reasoning—enabling cheaper Sol/Terra/Luna orchestration inside Codex's Goal feature.

Quote

코덱스가 참패했습니다. 코덱스가 졌습니다. 코덱스가 갈 길이 먼 것 같습니다.

3
Goobong Jeong
Team Attention

Workshop: How to Use Sol-Terra-Luna in One Goal

Worth noting

Speaker argues understanding, not execution, is the real bottleneck for running long agent goals, and shares how he uses voice, podcasts, and simulations built with Codex/Kimi to grasp complex ideas before steering Sol-Terra-Luna agents.

Quote

고를 잘 돌리려면 그냥 고를 잘 완성됐을 때 이 엔드스테이트에 대해서 내가 잘 설명을 해 줄 수 있어야 되고

4
Sasha Denisov
Brainform.ai

Workshop: MCP on Mobile: How Far Have We Come?

Worth noting

iOS/Android sandboxing blocks standard MCP transports (stdio, streamable HTTP); Apple App Intents and Android App Functions mimic MCP-like tool registries but are restricted to OS-controlled apps (Siri/Apple Intelligence, pre-installed apps), leaving on-device agents, MCP clients, or tunnel-based servers as the only viable paths today.

Quote

This is a $5 microcontroller. It can host MCP server. And we have a $1,300 mobile phone. It's not really can.

5
Sasha Denisov
Brainform.ai

Workshop: MCP on Mobile: How Far Have We Come?

Worth noting

Live demo using his flutter_gemma/flutter_gemma_agent plugin showed an on-device Gemma model calling a local calendar skill fully offline, then querying a remote MCP server over a streamable transport for session info.

Quote

You can run multimodal LLMs, you can run in thinking mode, you can run speech to text and text to speech.

6
Kevin Dubois & Daniel Oh
IBM · Red Hat

Workshop: Building MCP Servers and Agentic AI Workflows in Java

Worth noting

Live demo shows Quarkus+LangChain4j building Java MCP servers/agents via simple annotations, with hot reload, a dev UI for testing tools, and composable sequential, parallel, and autonomous supervisor agent workflows with human-in-the-loop and A2A remote agents.

Quote

You can write your servers in one language and your client in another language and they will interoperate just fine.