Agentic AI Foundation
HomeEventsResourcesNewsletters
Sign in
Copyright © The Linux Foundation®. All rights reserved. The Linux Foundation has registered trademarks and uses trademarks. For more information, including terms of use, privacy policy, and trademark usage, please see our Policies page.
← Conference Recap
MCP Dev Summit
Seoul 2026
MLOps Community
AI Agents SummitCoding Agents ConferenceAgents in Production 2025
On this page
ThemesAgent architecture and runtime designProduction reliability and safetySecurity and sandboxingObservability and failure analysisEvaluation and testing
Resources/Conference Recap/MLOps Community
AI Agents Summit

AI Agents Summit

11 talks, 6 themes, one fast way through the event — key takeaways, standout quotes, and every recording from AI Agents Summit.

On this page
ThemesAgent architecture and runtime designProduction reliability and safetySecurity and sandboxingObservability and failure analysisEvaluation and testing

Themes

Agents overview and framing A high-level look at the AI agents landscape setting the stage for the rest of the day. 1 talks ↓ Agent architecture and runtime design How teams design multi-agent systems, durable runtimes, and context strategies for real workloads. 3 talks ↓ Production reliability and safety Patterns and hard lessons for shipping agents to millions of users without things falling apart. 3 talks ↓ Security and sandboxing Protecting agent systems from injection attacks and rethinking MCP versus sandboxed execution. 2 talks ↓ Observability and failure analysis A deep dive into diagnosing the conversation failure that broke an agent in production. 1 talks ↓ Evaluation and testing Foundations of agent evaluation, comparing SQL and filesystem-based approaches to structured data. 1 talks ↓

Agent architecture and runtime design

1
Ferran Sanoyan
Zipline AI (co-founder; original author of Chronon at Airbnb)

Building Agents for High-Stakes Systems

Worth noting

Rather than replacing fraud/risk models with agents, Zipline/Chronon lets agents propose new features via branch-isolated, compute-reusing pipelines that are reviewable and reproducible before humans approve production launch.

Quote

You don't want to be sending a bunch of contacts to an agent to say, "Hey, which of these thousands of listings should I rank these thousand listings for this user?

2
Aditya Gautam
Meta

What's Special About Meta's Multi-Agent Systems for Short-Form Video

Worth noting

Meta uses a three-agent pipeline (perceiver, retriever, reasoner) with small 4-11B fine-tuned VLMs plus caching, semantic hashing, and dynamic routing to detect content theft and modality mismatch across ~100M-1B short-form videos cost-effectively.

Quote

In a 1-hour video, you can have multiple of these things which are actually breaking the policy.

3
Viren Baraiya
Orkes (Co-founder & CTO)

Building a Durable Runtime for AI Agents

Worth noting

Orkes built Agent Span, an open-source runtime (on top of Conductor OSS) that treats agents as "late-bound sagas" — LLMs plan via JSON, the server executes with durability, human-in-loop, and ephemeral credential injection at runtime.

Quote

Agents are not programs. Programs are deterministic. Agents are dynamically generated instructions, which means you need a different way of thinking about it.

Production reliability and safety

1
Haytham
CTO, Union AI (co-creator of Flyte)

Building AI Agents That Survive Production

Worth noting

Argues agent platforms need three properties—dynamic (plain code, no DSL), durable (crash recovery, caching), and defended (sandboxed code execution)—illustrated by Dragonfly's 4-tier agent system cataloging 250,000+ software products in production within hours.

Quote

Agents do fail and they will fail in production, and this is to be expected.

2
Noah Summerfield
Databricks (Delivery Solutions Architect)

Patterns for Getting AI Agents to Production Safely

Worth noting

Databricks describes production-grade agent patterns: semantic layers with defined metrics to prevent hallucinated numbers, "lakebase" branchable databases for agent memory, and MLflow-based LLM judges for dev and production monitoring loops.

Quote

If you roll it out to 100 sales folks and three executives and they all ask the agent what's our run rate, does it calculate and come back with the same answer every time?

3
Navya Jammalamadaka
Microsoft

What Breaks in Production When You Ship AI Agents to Millions of Users

Worth noting

Identifies four production agent failure modes—context collapse, tool/API chaos, prompt injection, latency cascades—and argues for health-check monitors, input validation, and reasoning-trace logging over simple request/response logs.

Quote

Scaling an agent isn't about making it smarter, it's about making it safer to be wrong.

Security and sandboxing

1
Avery Kitch
Google (Staff Software Engineer, MCP Toolbox for Databases)

Stop AI Agents From SQL Injecting Your Database

Worth noting

Google's MCP Toolbox secures DB access by evolving tools from raw SQL/credentials to pre-approved, parameterized queries with bound auth tokens, hiding all credentials and PII from the agent.

Quote

Your data is only as secure as your agent. Users, if they try hard enough, can trick the agent into doing anything.

2
Rodney Shen
Text QL

Why We Moved Away from MCPs and Chose Sandboxes

Worth noting

TextQL found a single Notion MCP integration doubled their agent's tool count (10→21 tools, ~7,000 tokens), ballooning to 350,000+ round-tripped tokens over 50 tool calls and degrading output trust.

Quote

We just give it its own computer and it'll just write the code itself.

Observability and failure analysis

1
Vidya Meenakshi Kambhampati
Intuit

One Failure That Broke Our Agent Conversation Forever

Worth noting

A missing constraint in a Pydantic field description caused 12 retries, a 504 timeout, and permanent conversation corruption; explicit field constraints fixed it in seconds.

Quote

Before the fix, vague error resulted in retry loop that resulted in timeout that resulted in corruption. But after the fix, LLM could read the rules, caught the issue within few seconds.

Evaluation and testing

1
Jess Wang
Braintrust

Evals 101 + An Independent Eval: SQL vs. Bash/Filesystem Agents for Structured Data

Worth noting

Braintrust's independent eval found an SQL agent hit 100% accuracy at ~150k tokens/call vs. a bash agent's 50% accuracy at over 1M tokens/call on structured GitHub data queries.

Quote

We were seeing a lot of excitement online about the fact that you can hand file systems and bash tools to AI agents and that's really all they need.

Next →
Coding Agents Conference